Cancer Biology Group

Scientific overview

According to the world health organization (WHO), malignant neoplasms are the most common cause of death worldwide. Despite intensive research on carcinogenesis this frightening scenario will persist mainly due to the overall increase of lifetime expectancy. Furthermore, most cancers are only diagnosed in an advanced stage, which prohibits curative treatment and a large proportion of patients do not respond to their chemotherapy. In a concerted action, based on the recent improvements of methodological techniques, we develop strategies for the identification of patients at risk and tumors and we intend to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers as guides for patient’s successful treatment at different stages of the disease. These goals are approached by means of newest high-throughput technologies combined with computational analyses. On the other side, and at least of similar importance, we perform functional experiments to identify pathomechanisms underlying tumor development, progression and latency.

DNA Methylation analyses in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) accounts for more than 900,000 cases per year and is the second most common cancer among men worldwide. The clinical course of PC is heterogeneous, ranging from indolent tumours requiring no therapy during lifetime to highly aggressive PC developing into a metastatic disease. Despite its high prevalence, the clinical management of PC is limited by the low specificity of the existing diagnostic and prognostic tools and the lack of effective systemic therapeutic strategies

A large proportion of PCs harbor gene fusions involving members of the ETS family and the androgen regulated transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) gene, most commonly involving the v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog ERG that is observed in approximately 50% of all PC cases. The overexpression of ERG is thought to be sufficient for the initiation of PIN (prostate intraepithelial neoplasia) lesions, a precursor of PC. Other rearrangements are less frequent and tend to be present in PCs already harboring the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion (FUS+). This suggests that other molecular mechanisms than trans- locations like alterations in the methylation or gene expression pattern must play a driving role in the TMPRSS2:ERG negative (FUS-) subclass.

Using a MeDIP-Seq approach on 51 tumor (20 TMPRSS2:ERG fusion negative (FUS-); 17 TMPRSS2:ERG fusion positive (FUS+)) and 53 normal samples we identified 147.000 differentially methylated regions comparing tumour and normal samples of which marker sets for future prostate cancer detection could be derived and successfully tested in independent sample sets. Most importantly, comparing FUS+ and FUS- samples revealed a significantly altered methylation pattern in FUS- cancers, while FUS+ samples were more equal to normal samples. Interestingly, we found EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) – a polycomb group gene – significantly up-regulated in tumour samples. Increased expression can be explained by ERG in FUS+ samples while in FUS-samples we found mi- R26a – a suppressor of EZH2 - significantly down-regulated. We could show that hypermethylation of a 2kb region near miR26a is causative for miR26a supppression in FUS-samples. Thus, we developed a model for prostate tumour formation: In FUS+ cells, ERG overexpression results in overexpression of oncogenes like MYC, and EZH2 causing hypermethylation of homeobox genes leading to a reversion of differentiation and tumour formation. On the other hand FUS-samples exhibit a methylator phenotype accompagnied by hypermethylation of regulatory microRNA genes like miR26a (suppressing EZH2) or miR34 (suppressing MYC). Suppression of the regulatory microRNAs results in overexpression of MYC and EZH2, the latter augmenting aberrations in the DNA methylation pat- tern. Next steps are now to identify causes and consequences of the differential methylation patterns in FUS-samples. Our goal is to identify modifier enzymes responsible for the aberrant methylation pattern and to investigate mechanisms reverting the observed phenotype.

Identification of genetic and epigenetic alterations underlying colon cancer progression

Colon cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type worldwide and in 2004 over 1 million new cancer cases have been diagnosed. Thus, one focus of the group is to identify colon cancer progression markers e.g. methylation markers and to set them in relation to the pathomechanism of tumour formation and progression. We have already identified a set of biomarkers – miRNAs as well as differentially methylated regions (cDMRs) which we are validating. We have picked the candidate biomarkers out of genome-wide screens which we had performed on a large cohort of CRC cases. Now, having these data sets completed, we are in the privileged position to investigate them more intensively and to develop a picture of CRC alterations. Based on our extensive data sets on gene and miRNA expression, mutations and methylation alterations, we are now working on an integrative view of colorectal cancer. Using diverse bioinformatics visualization tools we try to get hold on genome-wide pathogenic alterations and to identify a temporal order of modifications.

Functional analyses of cervical cancer pathogenesis and development of antiviral substances

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women with a world- wide prevalence of 2,27 millions and with an estimated 490,000 new cases and

270,000 deaths per year. “High risk” human papillomaviruses are detected in over 98% of cervical carcinoma cases. Together with Prof. Dr. Peter Howley (Harvard Medical School, Boston) we have found that the interaction between the viral E2 protein and the cellular bromodomain containing protein Brd4 is required for the genome maintenance and the viral transcriptional regulation functions and thereby regulate cervical cancer pathogenesis. We are now working on specific inhibitors of this interaction and we are using NGS technologies for an investigation of functional consequences for cervical cancer pathogenesis. Our experiments show that a disruption of the interaction between E2 and Brd4 leads to a curing of cells from papillomavirus infections and thereby might prevent cervical cancer.

Brd4 with its two bromodomains binds to acetylated histones, pTEFb (positive transcription elongation factor) and is dealt as master regulator of the epigen- etic memory. We have found that Brd4 plays a significant role in transcriptional regulation, but that it is also a central partner in the oxidative stress response. Preliminary experiments indicate that an epigenetic regulation of the defense mechanisms against reactive oxygen species functions over histone methylations.

Taken together, the goals of the Cancer Genomics Group are to integrate different fields of medicine, biology and natural science in order to better understand how tumor cells work and how carcinogenic processes are regulated. Knowledge of disease- relevant alterations in gene sequences and molecules of the metabolic network will reveal targets for effective diagnostic and therapeutic applications. With the availability of these techniques we are on a turning point of cancer di- agnosis and treatment.

Go to Editor View