|
Antibodies, or
more commonly binder molecules, are inevitably important tools for the
functional characterisation of human gene products. Next to immunisation of
various laboratory animals, a number of in vitro
selection techniques exist to obtain highly specific binders, of which
phage display is the most common. Within the last few years, we have worked
on a conveyer-belt type production pipeline for the generation of human
recombinant antibody molecules applying the phage display technology.
Selection
of phage display-derived antibodies
Within the
NGFN 2 funding period we successfully participated in the SMP
“Antibody Factory”, which set out to evaluate all necessary
processes for establishing phage display of human antibody fragments as a
routine method to generate binders against human gene products on large
scale. Our subproject was concerned with the semi-automation of panning and
evaluation procedures. We considered all necessary aspects ranging from the
expression of in vivo biotinylated antigens in E. coli
or mammalian cells and more recently Leishmania tarentolae
as hosts. Further, we developed a selection process based on robotic
manipulation of streptavidin-coated magnetic bead, as well as protein
microarray based screening methods for fast determination of
target-specificity by applying the Multiple Spotting Technique.
Additionally, we developed a laboratory information management system
(LIMS) to store all generated clones and relevant experimental data.
Finally, we succeeded with the assembly of streamlined selection pipeline
which now could go into production if funding were available.
Selection of binder molecules
with inhibitory properties
This project is dedicated
to the selection of binder molecules, which allow specific blocking of
protein-protein interactions and was developed in close collaboration with
the group of Dr. Sylvia Krobitsch in our department (now Otto Warburg
Laboratory). We successfully established a combined in vitro / in vivo selection scheme to obtain
inhibitory antibodies, called intrabodies. First, phage display libraries
are enriched in vitro on immobilised target
proteins and once the diversity of the libraries are reduced to a
complexity amenable to reverse yeast-2-hybrid screens, the selection is
continued in vivo, where the selection is carried out with interaction
pairs of the target proteins. Resulting binders not only bind their
respective target proteins, but also inhibit defined protein-protein
interaction of the targets in vivo. The method is applied using protein-protein interaction
pairs involved in Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (Ataxia UK).
Exploring autoimmune antibody libraries
On the quest
to obtain the best antibody scaffold for phage display, we have generated
several new semi-synthetic antibody libraries in different formats and are
currently assembling a large naïve antibody library exclusively from donors
with autoimmune disorders. This group of individuals possess large number
of antibodies directed against self-proteins and should therefore be a great
resource for developing binders against human gene products in future.
Furthermore, we are interested to find out if there is a correlation
between individual V-gene usage and autoimmune disorders. For this purpose,
we intend to select specific binders towards known autoantigens in
different autoimmune disorders and combine the outcome of these selections
with the knowledge of general antibody repertoire of autoimmune patients we
obtain applying next generation sequencing technologies.
Discovery of antibody–antigen interaction pairs in human
disease
Many human
diseases are characterised by the presence of antibodies directed towards
self-proteins. In most cases, the existence of self-reactive antibodies is
not fully understood, as the pathogenic role of such antibodies is –
with some exceptions – not known. This is also clearly demonstrated
by the fact, that every individual has autoantibodies even without being
affected by disease and that autoantigenicity patterns overlap (Figure 1).
Furthermore, our knowledge about the role of certain autoantibodies in
disease progression, whether being of significance or simply a bystander
effect, is still vague.
In this
respect, we focused our work in recent years in close collaboration with
the Charité on the characterisation of autoantigenicity patterns in healthy
and diseased individuals. We concentrated primarily on autoimmune disorders
and the diseases under investigation ranged from systemic to organ-specific
autoimmune diseases (BMBF-Nutrigenomics project), including systemic lupus
erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, celiac disease and thyroiditis
(Graves’ and Hashimoto). Further, screening with sera of dilated
cardyomyopathy patients were performed (SFB-TR19 project) and currently
autoantigenicity profiling for multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s
disease are on the way (BMWi-ZIM project). Additionally, we expanded our
efforts to identify biomarker sets for therapy response prediction in
systemic autoimmune disorders on the example of second line treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) blocking
agents.
Next
to protein arrays, screening for autoantigens is additionally performed
using cDNA expression libraries cloned in M13 or T7 display vectors
presenting the recombinant proteins on the bacteriophage surface. Selection
is carried out in an iterative process – essentially based on
affinity enrichment – using patient-derived immunoglobulin fractions
as selection targets and finally, mass sequencing the cDNA inserts applying
next generation sequencing technology of individual bacteriophage molecules
identifies the putative autoantigens (Figure 2).
Generating autoantigenicity patterns applying protein arrays
For basic
screening we apply high-density protein macroarrays carrying >38.000
clones expressing human recombinant proteins, which are comprised of
>10.000 different genes and splice variant thereof. Using this
technology, which was developed in our department in the late 90’s,
lead to the identification of ~1.600 clones expressing potential
autoantigens against which healthy and diseased individuals reacted.
Notably, the number of autoantigens detected in different disorders
decrease with organ specificity. For instance, in rheumatoid arthritis and
celiac disease, more than 500 different antigens were scored positive,
while in thyroiditis, only ~ 200 clones reacted.
To elucidate
the autoreactivity pattern of celiac disease patients in more detail, we
have generated protein microarrays with a selection of 160 purified
recombinant human proteins and controls, such as commonly used diagnostic
markers for the disease (tissue transglutaminase and wheat gliadin) and
compared the screening results of 142 patients with that of 50 healthy
individuals. Finally, we could identify a number of autoantigens which
might serve for diagnostic purposes in patients with IgA-deficiency in
future. This is particularly useful, since coeliac disease patients with
IgA-deficiency remain frequently undetected in routine diagnosis.
Identification of diagnostic markers for therapy response prediction
In systemic
autoimmune disorders, treatment comprises the administration of
corticosteroids or immunosuppressive medication. In rheumatoid arthritis,
first line treatment is carried out with disease-modifying antirheumatic
drugs (DMARDs), such as Methotrexate (MTX). Second line treatment of
MTX-resistant patients is carried out with biologicals, mainly tumour
necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)
blocking agents, such as monoclonal antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab) or
soluble TNFα-receptor
(etanercept). The major drawback of treating rheumatoid arthritis with TNFα inhibitory
biologicals is its high cost as well as the fact that 30-40% of treated
individuals do not respond or only poorly respond to treatment. In a pilot
study, we have identified a set of biomarkers according which we can
potentially discriminate between therapy responders and non-responders and
are currently evaluated (BMBF-KMU Innovativ). Furthermore, a clinical study
is on its way to recruit 120 patients treated with etanercept (sponsored by
Wyeth BioPharma GmbH). Screening autoantigenicity patterns with these
specific patient sera shall allow the identification of therapy prediction
biomarkers specific for etanercept.
|