Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics - Ihnestraße 73 - 14195 Berlin - Germany - Phone: (+49 30) 8413 0 - Fax: (+49 30) 8413 1388

   Evolutionary Genomics Group        Department of Computational Molecular Biology


Home
People
Projects
Lectures
Server
Jobs
Publications
Contact

Title:
CpG deamination creates transcription factor binding sites with high efficiency.

Authors:
Tomasz Zemojtel, Szymon M Kielbasa, Peter F Arndt, Sarah Behrens, Guillaume Bourque, Martin Vingron

Abstract:
The formation of new transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) has a major impact on the evolution of gene regulatory networks. Clearly, single nucleotide mutations arising within genomic DNA can lead to the creation of TFBSs. Are molecular processes inducing single nucleotide mutations contributing equally to the creation of TFBSs? In the human genome, a spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosine in the context of CpG dinucleotides results in the creation of thymine (C->T) and this mutation has the highest rate among all base substitutions. CpG deamination has been ascribed a role in silencing of transposons and induction of variation in regional methylation. We have previously shown that CpG deamination created thousands of p53 binding sites within genomic sequences of Alu transposons. Interestingly, we have defined a ∼30 bp region in Alu sequence, which, depending on a pattern of CpG deamination, can be converted to functional p53, PAX-6 and Myc binding sites. Here, we have studied single nucleotide mutational events leading to creation of TFBSs in promoters of human genes and in genomic regions bound by such key transcription factors as Oct4, NANOG and c-Myc. We document that CpG deamination events can create TFBSs with much higher efficiency than other types of mutational events. Our findings add a new role to CpG methylation: We propose that deamination of methylated CpGs constitutes one of the evolutionary forces acting on mutational trajectories of TFBSs formation contributing to variability in gene regulation.


Reference:
Genome Biology and Evolution (2011)

Links:
[Journal]
[Fulltext (pdf)]